Nancy Sondergard, the spokesperson for the Friends of McDermott Park was on Between the Lines with Greg Stensland this morning. In the interview she spoke about how the Friends' will go forward and work to improve the park.
Listen to the interview by clicking HERE
Let's keep McDermott Park open for use by all the citizens of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin 365 days of the year - today, tomorrow and long into the future.
Wednesday, August 26, 2015
Tuesday, August 25, 2015
WLA Decides to Discontinue Lease Negotiations for McDermott Park
This morning, spokesperson, Rev Boggs, told Greg Stensland on Between the Lines that WLA will not continue lease negotiations with the City of Fond du Lac for McDermott Park.
Listen to the interview HERE
The Fond du Lac Reporter also has an article. Read it HERE
Listen to the interview HERE
The Fond du Lac Reporter also has an article. Read it HERE
Monday, August 24, 2015
Join Our Mailing List
You can join our mailing list by signing up via the sidebar or by sending an email to preservemcdermott@gmail.com. Please put your name in the email and we will add you to our mailing list.
Thanks for your interest in McDermott Park!
Thanks for your interest in McDermott Park!
City, WLA Should Void Lease - Opinion Piece in FDL Reporter
You can read the latest opinion piece in the Fond du Lac Reporter by clicking HERE
Wednesday, August 19, 2015
Tuesday, August 18, 2015
Visions for McDermott Park
Today, Tuesday, August 18, Nancy Sondergard was a guest on Between the Lines with Greg Stensland. They talked about an alternate vision for McDermott Park. You can listen to the program by clicking HERE
Monday, August 10, 2015
Friends of McDermott Park on Between the Lines with Greg Stensland
Greg Stensland of WFDL interviewed Nancy Sondergard today on Between the Lines. Nancy is the leader/spokesperson for the Friends of McDermott Park.
Click HERE to listen to the program.
Click HERE to listen to the program.
Saturday, August 8, 2015
Overlay Map of Leased Areas
The yellow dotted lines surround the area that is the subject of the 2005 lease agreement that runs for 30 years. There is much more to this 2005 lease agreement.
The city wrote the 2005 lease in return for an easement across the northern portion of WLA's property. The city needed this easement because land in McDermott Park was to be used for a treatment plant. The lease went into effect June 1, 2005. By July 1, 2005, the city had abandoned the McDermott Park treatment plan. Yes, one month after the effective date, the easement was no longer needed. For that the city gave up 30 yrs of rights to this 1 acre of McDermott Park. You can read more on this time period by clicking here.
Tuesday, August 4, 2015
Park Watch Fond du Lac - Statement Regarding McDermott Park
July 30, 2015
Park Watch believes that before any changes are made to the topography of
McDermott Park it needs to be evaluated by an engineer familiar with extreme
rain events. Residents of the area report that the park was significant in
flood mitigation during the 2008 rain event. Other parks including the
Greenway Arboretum absorbed high amounts of flood waters and helped to
protect homes that are near the many waterways in Fond du Lac. This is a
very important function for Fond du Lac green spaces since the entire
community is built on a marsh. (This statement was created and presented to
Park Watch members before the recent revelation that indeed this park is
important to flood mitigation efforts.)
After the evaluation has been made by a credible and qualified engineer, the
report needs to come back to the City Council for a final vote. It is not
acceptable for an appointed city staff person to have the final decision on
whether or not the changes to the landscaping will go forward. This decision
belongs to elected officials who the citizens are able to hold accountable
in subsequent elections.
Generally Park Watch members believe that our green spaces should be
preserved for all the citizens.
We find creating more baseball diamonds in the city a waste of effort. The
most recent Recreation Plan 2015 to 2020 on page 30 lists the "Recreational
Demand & Needs by Facility - 2013." This list states that the demand for
baseball diamonds is 8 and we have 10 in the City of Fond du Lac; softball
diamond demands are 8 diamonds and we have 11. Also important to note is
that there are two baseball diamonds managed by Fond du Lac Youth Baseball
that are locked and not being used.
Park Watch was founded in 2005. Our Mission Statement is as follows: Park
Watch is a citizen group concerned with preserving and restoring natural
habitat on public lands in the FDL area and improving access to nature
through education and trails. We have a mailing list of over 30 people who
are kept informed of local issues that concern our natural habitat on public
lands.
Laura P. DeGolier
Chairman, Park Watch of Fond du Lac
Park Watch believes that before any changes are made to the topography of
McDermott Park it needs to be evaluated by an engineer familiar with extreme
rain events. Residents of the area report that the park was significant in
flood mitigation during the 2008 rain event. Other parks including the
Greenway Arboretum absorbed high amounts of flood waters and helped to
protect homes that are near the many waterways in Fond du Lac. This is a
very important function for Fond du Lac green spaces since the entire
community is built on a marsh. (This statement was created and presented to
Park Watch members before the recent revelation that indeed this park is
important to flood mitigation efforts.)
After the evaluation has been made by a credible and qualified engineer, the
report needs to come back to the City Council for a final vote. It is not
acceptable for an appointed city staff person to have the final decision on
whether or not the changes to the landscaping will go forward. This decision
belongs to elected officials who the citizens are able to hold accountable
in subsequent elections.
Generally Park Watch members believe that our green spaces should be
preserved for all the citizens.
We find creating more baseball diamonds in the city a waste of effort. The
most recent Recreation Plan 2015 to 2020 on page 30 lists the "Recreational
Demand & Needs by Facility - 2013." This list states that the demand for
baseball diamonds is 8 and we have 10 in the City of Fond du Lac; softball
diamond demands are 8 diamonds and we have 11. Also important to note is
that there are two baseball diamonds managed by Fond du Lac Youth Baseball
that are locked and not being used.
Park Watch was founded in 2005. Our Mission Statement is as follows: Park
Watch is a citizen group concerned with preserving and restoring natural
habitat on public lands in the FDL area and improving access to nature
through education and trails. We have a mailing list of over 30 people who
are kept informed of local issues that concern our natural habitat on public
lands.
Laura P. DeGolier
Chairman, Park Watch of Fond du Lac
Sunday, August 2, 2015
27 July 2015 Advisory Parks Board Meeting Summary
27 July 2015 Advisory Parks Board
Meeting Summary
Below is a written summary of the July
2015 Advisory Parks Board Meeting. This is the segment before the
public comments. Thanks to Greg Stenslands Between the Lines program, you can listen to the public commments here.
The 27 July 2015 Advisory Parks Board
meeting started with a statement by Jordan Skiff, the Director of
Public Works for the City of Fond du Lac. He stated that there were
two significant considerations that caused WLA to not present a revised
proposal at the meeting.
The first significant consideration was
the 2005 lease between WLA and the city. The current copy came from
a search of WLA files. The city has not been able to locate a copy in their files. This answers our questions about why the lease is not dated or
notarized. An offical copy has not been located. He stated that with staff turnover at the city and WLA,
locating documents has been hard.
He described the area under the
lease as a 60 ft wide x 750 ft long strip. (See the map below that
shows this area, it is the red strip on the east property line of McDermott park, in the legal description with the 2005 lease it is about 1 acre of the park) He said the city likely approached WLA because the
city needed an easement across the WLA property for the proposed
water mixing plant that was to be located in McDermott Park, but it
was never built. He said WLA clearly got something out of the lease.
The second consideration is the
floodway. He showed the floodway and the flood fringe on a map and
described how a floodway acts in an event. (Below you will see a
flood plain map of the area. In our map the floodway is blue and the flood fringe is tan.)
Basically, water moves in a floodway. In
the flood fringe, the water pools; it is more like standing water.
You can understand the importance of this distinction if you think
about what you want to have happen when you have a flood. You want
the water to move out. The floodway is where this occurs.
The
performance of the floodway is very very important during a flooding
event. That is the pathway to get water out so you do not have more
flooding. Because it is the pathway for the water to leave, there
are special restrictions on the floodway areas. As Mr Skill stated:
The land elevation cannot be raised more than 0.01 ft. (Well, you
can do that, but you must compensate by lowering somewhere on the
property to replace what you have altered. This is very expensive and
highly unlikely for McDermott Park) Mr Skiff said there are options
for the flood fringe area and WLA and their engineers may be looking
at that.
Mr Skiff then addressed “How we got
here.” In a previous discussion with staff on both sides (none of who were
involved in the current discussions) there was another
plan. (This is shown below. The time stamp on the photo says
7/24/2011, we are calling this the 2011 proposal) When they started talking about a year ago, this was a
document they looked at. He was concerned about how spread out it
was and he asked WLA to compress the plan. Unfortunately, they
didn't consider the floodway.
He also wanted residents to know that
any construction will have to comply with the storm water code. Not
only is quantity an issue, runoff quality is important as well.
Usually a wet pond is constructed and solids have a chance to settle
out before the water goes into the storm water system.
Mr Skiff
ended his presentation by saying the ball is in WLA's court. Then
he took questions from the board.
Board member Block asked if the
floodway can be recreated in the flood fringe. Mr Skiff said yes,
but it is very expensive and most unlikely here.
She asked if field
#2 was fenced in the earlier proposal. (2011, this is the northern
most field, it is right by the parking lot) He said they did not get
that far in the discussion.
She asked if the proposed south parking
lot was in the flood area? No it is not. At this point, Mr Skill
moved the illustration so the 121 stall parking lot was visible.
Board member Eischeid asked about
section #3 in the lease. Is WLA the sole user of the parking lot if
it is built? Mr Skiff said that would be his reading but he would
follow up with the city attorney. He said the lease is broadly
written and does not protect either party very well.
He mentioned
that Mr Brossenboek was under the impression that the public had the
right (not just the opportunity) to access the baseball field. The
lease does not seem to grant this right.
Mr Eischeid asked about
section #14: does it mean WLA would have to remove a parking lot in
2036 if they built it? Mr Skiff said, yes, but he also thought the
DPW could have it remain and the city would take it over. Mr
Eischeid also confirmed that there is no renewal language.
At this point, Mr Skiff said that city
staff had hoped before the floodway issue came up to find a way to
make the new lease work with this 2005 lease and that they would try
to make them compatible.
Board member Dennis asked if the city
had alternate plans for McDermott Park. Mr Skiff said they do not.
There is nothing in the capital improvement plan. He said all the
citizen interest expressed about the WLA lease proposal might make them
take a look at it. He said there had been a question about why the
city did not do the improvements to the ball fields and lease back to
WLA. City Manager Moore has stated there is no need in the city for
the ball fields, and that is correct. The city has plenty of ball fields.
Mr Skiff talked of meetings he had with
Dr Clements and Ms Sondergard. He said Dr Clements was interested in
a path that would connect with other parks and the Agnesian paths.
He said Ms Sondergard had neat ideas, but he felt all of those could
be put in the northern area of McDermott park that was outside of the
WLA lease area.
Next, Principal Dave Schroeder of WLA
spoke. He said they were notified by the city on Thursday, July 23rd of the floodway issue.
They told their supporters they did not need to appear at the
meeting and that might explain why there were mostly people opposed
to the WLA proposal at this meeting. He said they had met today with
the city about the floodway issues. They will go to their Executive
Board and their General Board. Those meetings are this Thursday
(7/30/2015) and next Monday (8/3/2015) and they will keep in touch
with the city.
Board member McCready asked if the city
got an easement for the piece of land in the 2005 lease? The
question was asked of board member Kiefer as he was the Superintendent of Parks at the time. He said, yes, the lease was in exchange
for the easement, but the city never used the easement. The easement
still exists.
Board member Eischeid asked if WLA
could extend their existing parking lot 60 ft to the east. Mr
Schroeder said that was part of their revised proposal, but they are
revising this again.
Mr. Eischied said he had asked for the
emails sent to city council members about McDermott park. He took
those roughly 80 emails and signatures on the petition against the
proposal as well as the people speaking at the last parks board
meeting and his tally was 75 in favor and 188 opposed.
Board Member Block asked if WLA could
build a parking lot right now on the 60 ft strip with city approval.
Mr Skiff said they could with his approval.
At this point, the public spoke. You
can hear those comment here
http://www.radioplusinfo.com/episode/7-28-mcdermott-park/
At the end of the meeting, City Clerk
Margaret Hefter said that the City Council resolution approving the
execution of a lease with WLA was found. She would email that to
anyone who wanted it. That resolution will be addressed in another post.
2005 Lease between WLA and the City of Fond du Lac
Included in the July 27, 2015 Advisory Parks Board Agenda packet was a lease executed in 2005 between WLA and the city of Fond du Lac. Below you will find that lease.
Several things about this document are interesting.
- It is not dated or notarized.
- The lease was executed because the city needed an easement to cross the north end of WLA's property. This easement was for a utility pipe that was needed for the proposed surface water blending plant that was slated for McDermott Park. This plant was never built due to opposition by neighbors and other citizens.
- This explains why the current ball field at WLA extends into McDermott Park. The west side of that field is in McDermott Park. The lease essentially gives WLA rights to a 60 ft wide by 750 ft long piece of McDermott Park. That is about 1 acre of the park. Click here to see another post with a map of McDermott park and this leased area.
- Section 2a of this lease gives WLA the ability to build a parking lot in that area with only the approval of the Director of the City Department of Public Works.
- Citizens have noticed that WLA has a sign next to the tennis courts on McDermott Park property. This sign is a concern because there is not an official sign on the south end of the park showing that this is McDermott Park.
July 24, 2015– Jordan Skiff Memo
The last public meeting
concerning the proposal for WLA to lease McDermott Park was the
Advisory Parks Board Meeting on Monday, July 27, 2015. Before a
board meeting, the agenda for the meeting is posted on the city's
website in the calendar section. Click here to see the packet for
the July 27th meeting.
https://www.fdl.wi.gov/cofuploads/Park_Board_Agenda_Packet_0032.pdf
We watched for this
posting and it finally came late in the day on Friday, July 24th.
Below you will find the memo from Jordan Skiff, the Director of
Public Works included with the agenda. This document changed the
focus of the Advisory Parks Board Meeting.
In this Memo, Mr Skiff
revealed two things.
First, the city now
realizes that part of McDermott Park is in a “floodway” This
designation would make it very difficult for WLA to proceed with it's
planned ball diamond improvement. We don't really know what WLA's
engineering plan is for the park, but everyone is assuming they would
raise the ball diamond area. That would not be allowed in the
floodway, or if it is allowed, it would involve a very expensive
engineering solution to preserve the floodway in the event of a
flood.
The second item revealed
in the memo was the existence of a lease between WLA and the city
that was executed in 2005. That lease was also attached to the
Advisory Parks Board Agenda. Click here to read more about this2005 lease. This was the first time a copy of this lease was
produced.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)